|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1380
   |
Posted - 2014.03.20 21:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:CCP need to make null worth fighting for first.
null-sec exists since 2003? You say players were fighting in it just for fun? And there was NEVER any reasons to fight for it at all? 
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1382
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 17:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:March rabbit wrote:baltec1 wrote:CCP need to make null worth fighting for first. null-sec exists since 2003? You say players were fighting in it just for fun? And there was NEVER any reasons to fight for it at all? Can you think of any reason to invade goon space other than because its goons?
i dunno about goons....
but in 2011-2012 pretty huge part of 0.0 sec changed owners: Rogue Drone regions, angel regions, Delve, Querious....
According to your comment these wars never happened (there was no reasons to fight for 0.0 sec space)
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1404
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 09:10:00 -
[3] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:baltec1 wrote:Do industry players not deserve greater rewards for taking on greater risks? LOL. What risks are you taking by manufacturing in an outpost rather than Jita? ...Your supply ships getting blown up, your goods getting blown up when transporting them to market.
the same happens every day in high-sec
just passed Njaria (or how is name of a 0.5 system between Jita and Amarr) and found lots of CONCORD ships on both gates.....
On the other hand i have spent like 6 or more months manufacturing outpost in DroneLand back in 2011. Used 3 outposts to build needed parts. Used 3 systems to do intensive PI. Visiting 6*3*3 planets in 3 systems every day to collect/drop materials, restart factories, etc...
Orca from start
Freighter on parts build stage
And i haven't lost any ship doing this.
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1406
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 12:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Kyperion wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
You will be drowned out by the cartel propagandists who don't want those inconvenient facts to gain any traction.
Again: why is The Cartel system bad? Because not everyone wants to be an F1 goon lemming? Have you ever actually encountered them? You know, fought them, fought with them, had a chat with any of them besides headbutting the wall on the forums? Or are you just taking that talking point from people who appear to align with you as a "highsec player"? My point is, did you ever bother to find out for yourself?
Looking at their forum posts....
Looking at Mittani....
Looking at wide support for E1....
I don't see any reasons to meet them closer.
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1406
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 17:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:March rabbit wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Kyperion wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:
---
Dinsdale Pirannha:
You will be drowned out by the cartel propagandists who don't want those inconvenient facts to gain any traction.
---
Again: why is The Cartel system bad?
Because not everyone wants to be an F1 goon lemming? Have you ever actually encountered them? You know, fought them, fought with them, had a chat with any of them besides headbutting the wall on the forums? Or are you just taking that talking point from people who appear to align with you as a "highsec player"? My point is, did you ever bother to find out for yourself? Looking at their forum posts.... Looking at Mittani.... Looking at wide support for E1.... I don't see any reasons to meet them closer. That'd be a "no", then.
congratulations. you are right here.
It's like RL terrorists or USA soldiers: they can be really nice and cool people. And maybe it would be great to be in their team.
But it just happens that every time you meet them you are their target.
The same with goons in Eve: most of players only see bad side of them. And it is not other people's fail. When you only nice to your teammates don't blame others for hate towards you.
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1454
|
Posted - 2014.04.24 06:52:00 -
[6] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:I Accidentally YourShip wrote:Hasikan Miallok wrote:Rhes wrote:Judas Isu wrote:I don't think it should come as a shock to anyone. When the nerf bat swings it generally hits the mission runners first. That's fine. Level 4 missions provide way too much income for how little risk there is in running them. There is zero risk in any PvE activity that is done correctly. There is no such thing as a 100% PvE activity involving a ship in space in eve. The heroes we know as suicide gankers, awoxers and others of noble pursuits provide that small, non-zero risk. Riskier than a PL hotdrop in low. yeah but the activity itself provides 0 risk, it's the bits of the game that aren't the mission you're running that provide any risk. so they're correct when they say that missions involve no risk.
travelling in 0.0 in T1 industrial full of PLEXes won't kill you by itself
So they correct when they say that travelling in 0.0 is 100% safe?
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1455
|
Posted - 2014.04.24 09:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:March rabbit wrote:So they correct when they say that travelling in 0.0 is 100% safe? sure, wildly out of context comment is wildly out of context but i'll say yes anyway because why not. but jumping gate to gate has 0 reward, unlike missions.
ok. let's talk about anomalies and escalations.
I'm i right that 'done properly 0.0 sec anomalies and escalations present no risk'? Does it mean that they should not be rewarded better than high-sec lvl1 missions?
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1455
|
Posted - 2014.04.24 10:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:March rabbit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:March rabbit wrote:So they correct when they say that travelling in 0.0 is 100% safe? sure, wildly out of context comment is wildly out of context but i'll say yes anyway because why not. but jumping gate to gate has 0 reward, unlike missions. ok. let's talk about anomalies and escalations. I'm i right that 'done properly 0.0 sec anomalies and escalations present no risk'? Does it mean that they should not be rewarded better than high-sec lvl1 missions? let's just get it out the way before you spew more idiotic posts. solo pve activities in eve present 0 risk. the risk comes from them being in eve and exactly 0% of any risk in eve comes from a pve activity. in eve, pve activities have been that heavily documented that there are 0 unknown variables and therefore 0 risk will be present if you have at least one brain cell. there's a difference between "the activity has 0 risk" and "doing the activity has 0 risk". learn that difference before you post again.
you are too angry, little child. Keep calm - soon your mother will feed you with some milk
And now we got to the point where we see: activity itself provides no risk. Ok. Nice.
So when we speak about rewards vs risk we actually speak about risk provided by... players!
And now the next question: how would you balance ISK reward (completely computable) with player driven risk (unpredictable)?
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1468
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 06:34:00 -
[9] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Hoshi Sorano wrote:
If you want to equate your intelligence level to that of mere beasts who function primarily on instinct, then I suppose that's your call.
We tend to expect more from humans than we do animals.
Confirmed, you think Military Strategists arent human Thats an interesting and completely wierd point of view.
they are.
because they mostly plan to kill humans to make some other people richer.
And 'making some already rich people richer' is the only REAL reason to any war to be started. Only kids can think otherwise
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
1470
|
Posted - 2014.05.11 08:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
fudface wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Folks, read the newest dev blog. The goons in the post are gloating in their posts, so you know it is terrible for high sec.
In a few months, mission runners will now have to invest weeks and weeks of training, plus buy a hideously expensive implant, to get the privilege of a 45-50% nerf (correction from the original post, the null sec lackeys were even more vicious than I first thought) to all mission loot refines. if CCP destroys the income streams for hisec. surely that means they will have to make hisec safer to preserve the risk reward balance?
1. you can't 'destroy' income streams for highsec: marketing will always be present unless you move all the stuff to 0.0 and make these people trade there
2. risk/reward is totally subjective measure. you can do nothing to make all the people agree with its state at any moment
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|